Observational studyInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
The Challenges of Searching for Workforce Data About New Roles in NHS Mental Health Services: A Cross-Sectional Observation Study.
Observational study in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High quality information is essential for good workforce planning and development, and it is therefore important to have accurate data about roles within services. NHS mental health services have been under great pressure for several years with insufficient staff, high turnover and overwhelming demand. To help address this a variety of new staff roles have been introduced by mental health Trusts, for example, Clinical Associates in Psychology, Mental Health, and Wellbeing Practitioners. This paper describes in detail the difficulties encountered in mapping where these new roles have been introduced in England and how the challenges were addressed. Data was obtained through 26 structured interviews and 5 questionnaires from appropriate mental health Trust representatives in a variety of different leadership roles (eg, clinical leads, human resources leads, workforce development leads). The data was then sense-checked in 3 stakeholder reflection groups with 18 participants including representatives of professional bodies, service providers and policy makers. The data indicated that (1) NHS mental health workforce information is unexpectedly difficult to obtain and (2) sometimes of poor quality, eg, inaccurate or incomplete. Challenges obtaining this data included: • Fragmented responsibility within trusts for data relating to new roles. • Inconsistent nomenclature. • Coding and retrieval issues with the Electronic Staff Record (ESR). The paper concludes that changes to NHS mental health workforce data on new roles are needed, including better access to and a higher quality of data. It offers recommendations for improvement, including role naming consistency and allocation of responsibility for an overview of new roles data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.