Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41324436›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2025

Land conversion to cropland homogenizes variation in soil biota, gene assemblages, and ecological strategies on local and regional scales.

Haidong Gu, Zhuxiu Liu, Song Liu, Xiaojing Hu, Zhenhua Yu, Yansheng Li, Lujun Li, Yueyu Sui, Jian Jin, Xiaobing Liu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Haidong GuState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, PR China.
Zhuxiu LiuState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, PR China.
Song LiuState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, PR China.
Xiaojing HuState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, PR China.
Zhenhua YuState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, PR China.
Yansheng LiState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, PR China.
Lujun LiState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, PR China.
Yueyu SuiState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, PR China.
Jian JinState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, PR China.
Xiaobing LiuState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, PR China.
Zhongjun JiaState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, PR China.
Lei SunHeilongjiang Academy of Black Soil Conservation and Utilization, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, PR China.
Jonathan M AdamsSchool of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, PR China.
Marcel G A van der HeijdenDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Zurich 8008, Switzerland.
Junjie LiuState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-6264-005X
Guanghua WangState Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely considered that conversion of natural landscapes to agriculture results in biotic homogenization. A recent study comparing soil biota of 27 paired natural steppe soil (NS) and agricultural soil (AS) sites across 900 km in north-eastern China found that conversion to agriculture had increased spatial gradients in soil functional genes. Using the same shotgun metagenome samples, and bacterial amplicon data, we instead analyzed total observed variation at the between-site and within-site level. We found that from the perspective of community taxonomic composition, archaeal and fungal community variation was decreased in AS compared to NS at both within- and between-site scales. In contrast, the bacterial and metazoal community was homogenized only at the local scale. Total functional KEGG gene assemblage was homogenized in AS at both the local and regional scale, whereas "Y-A-S" strategies in bacteria were homogenized at the local scale but not the between-site scale. Overall, these results show a clear homogenizing effect of agriculture with respect to multiple aspects of soil taxonomic and functional diversity, though varying by scale. Certain abiotic soil properties showed homogenization in AS at within-site and between-site scales may explain this homogenization, and uniformity of plant cover in croplands likely contribute to the effect. These findings confirm and extend global-scale studies showing homogenization of soil biota in agricultural environments, revealing that effects extend to functional genes and the broad taxonomic spectrum of life-with potential loss of soil ecosystem resilience to environmental change resulting from agriculture.

Indexed as

AgricultureBacteriaBiotaSoil MicrobiologyArchaeaBiodiversityChinaEcosystemFungiMetagenomeSoilSoilecological strategyhomogeneityKEGG gene functionmollisolssoil biota

Identifiers

PMID41324436
PMCPMC12746289

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.