ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2026
Factors Accounting for Pharmacodynamic Variability of Basal Insulin Preparations in Euglycemic Clamp Settings in Healthy Individuals.
Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe euglycemic clamp technique is a standard method for assessing the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of insulin biosimilars compared to their reference products. Despite similar pharmacokinetic profiles, differences in the pharmacodynamic profiles between a basal insulin biosimilar and its reference product are not uncommon. This study aimed to identify potential factors contributing to this phenomenon.
methodsData were collected from euglycemic clamp studies comparing the PK/PD profiles of an insulin degludec biosimilar (BioIDeg) and the reference product, Tresiba. The ratio of the area under the curve of IDeg from 0 to 24 h (AUC
resultsFifty-eight healthy subjects were included, with 20 in group A and 38 in group B. Significant differences were found in target blood glucose (BG), basal C-peptide, AUC
conclusionVariations in target BG might contribute to PD variability of long-acting insulin preparations in euglycemic clamp settings in healthy individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41324776What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.