Evidence mapPaperPMID 41325464Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Two-leaves and many bites: Profiling dog-bites and adherence to rabies prophylaxis in tea-estate communities of Udalguri District, Assam, India.

Harish Kumar Tiwari, Parimala Mohanty, Rasika G Shirke, Aina Unnikrishnan Kurup, Chalasani Satwik, Shanti Priya Kindo, Riya Shigwan, Karma Wangdi, Jully Gogoi-Tiwari, Laura Cunha Silva and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Harish Kumar TiwariJyoti and Bhupat Mehta School of Health Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2911-9895
Parimala MohantyJyoti and Bhupat Mehta School of Health Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1442-5299
Rasika G ShirkeDY Patil University School of Public Health, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Aina Unnikrishnan KurupDY Patil University School of Public Health, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Chalasani SatwikIndian Institute of Public Health Delhi- Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Shanti Priya KindoJH CreIndia Foundation, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Riya ShigwanDBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance Intermediate Fellow, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Karma WangdiSchool of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Jully Gogoi-TiwariSchool of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Laura Cunha SilvaVeterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Salome DürrVeterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDog-mediated rabies disproportionately affects marginalised and socioeconomically disadvantaged communities. Tea estate (TE) communities in India exemplify one such vulnerable population. Despite their vulnerability, limited research has explored rabies epidemiology within TE settings. This retrospective study uses secondary data to evaluate the incidence of dog bite and their determinants amongst the TE communities in the Udalguri district of Assam state of India.

methodsSecondary data from 17 to 29 months (January 2022 to May 2024) were retrieved from the hospitals and dispensaries of 11 TE of Udalguri district, Assam. The collected information included dog-bite victims' demographics and adherence to post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Data were analysed using R software, employing descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, odds ratios and mixed-effect logistic regression. Administrative approval was obtained prior to data collection.

resultsA cumulative annual incidence of 11.8 bites per 1,000 individuals was recorded across 11 TE in Udalguri. Children aged ≤15 years accounted for 35% of cases, and dependents were the most affected occupational group (32%). Most exposures involved dogs (66%), and 76% of incidents were bites. Less than half (43%) of victims completed the full PEP regimen of five doses, although 71% received at least three doses. Chi-square analysis indicated that males and children aged ≤ 15 years were more likely to be bitten by dogs compared to other animals than females and the older residents. Children aged ≤ 15 years and non-workers had higher odds of receiving any PEP, while females and children aged ≤ 15 years are more likely to receive at least three doses. In multivariable analysis, females were less likely than males to be bitten by dogs compared to other animals (aOR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.3-0.7), older individuals had higher odds of completing PEP (aOR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2-2.8), and children (≤15 years) were more likely to receive at least three doses of PEP (aOR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.3). Temporal analysis showed no clear seasonal pattern, although spikes were observed during winter and monsoon months.

conclusionThis retrospective study contributes to build the foundation for community-based approach to control dog-mediated rabies in TE by highlighting key epidemiological patterns, demographic vulnerabilities and limitations of the existing intervention implementation delivery among TE communities. We recommend further in-depth investigations to inform the context specific interventions designed to address the unique vulnerabilities, thereby reducing the risk of rabies specifically in tea -estate populations.

Indexed as

Bites and StingsPost-Exposure ProphylaxisRabiesAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolDog DiseasesDogsFemaleHumansIncidenceIndiaInfantRabies Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID41325464
PMCPMC12680326

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.