Evidence mapPaperPMID 41325469Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Community engagement in mass drug administration participatory interventions: A scoping review.

Anouk Chouaïd, Sarah Louart, Adama Faye, El Hadj Ba, Jordi Landier, Valéry Ridde

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anouk ChouaïdUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, IRD, Inserm, Ceped, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2750-3316
Sarah LouartUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR - CLERSE - Centre Lillois d'Etudes Et de Recherches Sociologiques Et Economiques, Lille, France.
Adama FayeInstitute of Health and Development, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Fann-Dakar, Senegal.
El Hadj BaInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, Dakar, Sénégal.
Jordi LandierAix Marseille Univ, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, INSERM, SESSTIM, ISSPAM, Marseille, France.
Valéry RiddeUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, IRD, Inserm, Ceped, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community engagement (CE) has been increasingly acknowledged as a pivotal element in the efficacy of mass drug administration (MDA) programs designed to control and eradicate diseases such as malaria, lymphatic filariasis, and onchocerciasis. The objective of this scoping review was to evaluate the contribution of community engagement (CE) to participatory interventions for mass drug administration (MDA). A systematic search of six databases yielded 32 articles, spanning 24 MDA interventions across 20 countries, primarily in low- and middle-income settings. The review indicates that most CE initiatives are constrained to passive information dissemination, with a paucity of initiatives that prioritize active community involvement or decision-making. The review identified several key challenges, including a lack of clear definitions for CE, inconsistent objectives, and difficulties in evaluating its effectiveness. Despite evidence that CE can enhance MDA coverage and compliance, the lack of standardized frameworks hinders comprehensive evaluation and comparison across studies. Furthermore, only a minority of interventions involved communities in the design or evaluation stages of MDA programs. The findings emphasize the importance of context-specific approaches, especially in addressing local sociocultural dynamics and including marginalized populations. Future interventions should prioritize sustainable capacity-building and adopt participatory frameworks that promote shared decision-making. Addressing these challenges could enhance the effectiveness of MDA campaigns and improve health outcomes in affected communities.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationMass Drug AdministrationHumansMalariaOnchocerciasis

Identifiers

PMID41325469
PMCPMC12742743

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.