ArticlePLoS biology2025
Divergent and stabilizing selection shape the phenotypic space of Arabidopsis thaliana.
Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Why do we observe some plant phenotypes but not others? The multivariate phenotypic space occupied by individuals or species often reveals both limits and phenotypes strikingly deviating from main syndromes. These observations are usually thought to indicate, respectively, inviable trait combinations and unique phenotypes adapted to specific environments. However, the evolutionary drivers underlying trait covariations often remain unclear. Here, we characterized the phenotypic space of Arabidopsis thaliana by comparing 713 wild accessions collected across the globe with 2,544 artificially-created recombinant individuals. This, combined with the detection of adaptive processes operating within species, allowed us to elucidate the roles of natural selection as a driver of phenotypic (co)variations within A. thaliana. We found that the phenotypic space of this species is constrained and driven by varying levels of divergent and stabilizing selection across different traits. Moreover, at the margins of the European geographic range, strong directional selection favored outlier phenotypes characterized by very late flowering and variation in a WRKY transcription factor gene. Genome analyses revealed that these extreme phenotypes may be explained by hybridization between ancestral and modern lineages of A. thaliana. Our findings demonstrate how interplays between population history and natural selection shape phenotypic diversity in a plant species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.