ArticlePLoS genetics2025
Genome-wide selection inference at short tandem repeats.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- criTRia: A Classification System and Evidence Criteria for Tandem Repeat Locus-Disease Relationships.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Short tandem repeats (STRs) comprising repeated sequences of 1-6 bp are one of the largest sources of genetic variation in humans. STRs are known to contribute to a variety of disorders, including Mendelian diseases, complex traits, and cancer. Based on their functional importance, mutations at some STRs are likely to introduce negative effects on reproductive fitness over evolutionary time. We previously developed SISTR (Selection Inference at STRs), a population genetics framework to measure negative selection against individual STR alleles. Here, we extend SISTR to enable joint estimation of the distribution of selection coefficients across a set of STRs. This method (SISTR2) allows for more accurate analysis of a broader range of STRs, including loci with low mutation rates. We apply SISTR2 to explore the range of feasible mutation parameters and demonstrate substantial variation in mutation and selection parameters across different classes of STRs. Finally, we estimate the relative burden of de novo and inherited variation at STR vs. single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Our results suggest that whereas SNVs contribute a greater total burden of inherited variation in a typical genome, the burden of de novo mutations at STRs is greater than that of SNVs. Overall, we anticipate that the evolutionary insights gained from this study will be important for future studies of variation at STRs and their role in evolution and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.