SynthesisActa ophthalmologica2026
Systemic C-reactive protein levels and central serous chorioretinopathy: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Acta ophthalmologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elevated corticosteroid levels are the strongest known risk factor for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC), and previous studies have explored if alterations in systemic immunity could play a role in CSC. Here, we explored if elevated systemic C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of systemic low-grade inflammation, is associated with CSC. We systematically searched 12 literature databases on 12 April 2025 for studies in which blood CRP is measured in both patients with CSC and a comparable control group. Studies were reviewed qualitatively. Meta-analysis using the random-effects model was performed on the weighted mean difference in systemic CRP levels between patients with CSC and controls. Six studies comprising 544 patients with CSC and 655 control individuals were eligible for this review. The meta-analysis of the difference in CRP between patients with CSC and controls showed no statistically significant difference at 0.86 mg/L (95% CI: -1.03-2.75 mg/L; p = 0.37). One study reported a very high degree of association between elevated CRP and CSC, which was not reproduced in the other studies. The lack of association remained consistent in the sensitivity analyses. Current evidence does not suggest that elevated systemic CRP levels are associated with CSC. Further studies on CSC pathophysiology are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.