ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2026
New therapeutic strategies for Lafora disease: Evaluation of the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and metabolomic profile of intravenous VAL-1221 treatment.
Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lafora disease (LD) is a fatal progressive myoclonus epilepsy that affects previously healthy adolescents and lacks effective treatments. It is caused by pathogenic variants in EPM2A or NHLRC1, leading to the accumulation of polyglucosan in the brain and other tissues. This study is the first to evaluate the administration of a potentially disease-modifying drug - VAL-1221, a glycogen-degrading antibody-enzyme fusion - in LD patients through a 12-month compassionate use program. Five patients (aged 17-24 years; three females) with intermediate to advanced LD received VAL-1221 intravenous infusions (20 mg/kg every other week). Safety was monitored through treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), whereas efficacy was assessed using clinical scales, EEG and neuroimaging. Drug concentration profile was studied via liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and metabolomics via gas chromatography-MS of CSF. Four patients completed the full treatment course: one discontinued after eight months following status epilepticus. VAL-1221 was well tolerated, with five mild infusion-related TEAEs (skin rash in one, hypotension in four). Efficacy measures showed continued disease progression across patients. LC-HRMS analysis revealed no detectable levels of VAL-1221 in CSF. CSF metabolic profiling revealed no difference between untreated and VAL-1221-treated samples. These findings demonstrate that intravenous VAL-1221 is safe but ineffective, providing an important negative result that prevents further patient exposure to this approach and redirects efforts toward direct central nervous system delivery methods. The study also demonstrates the feasibility of assessing disease progression using clinical and neuroimaging measures, providing a valuable framework for clinical trials in LD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.