Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41326299›Full record

ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025

Mining the gaps: Deciphering Alzheimer's biology through AI-driven reconciliation.

Cory C Funk, Tom Paterson, Alex Bangs, David M Cannon, George Savage, Eric Ringger, Lee Hood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cory C FunkInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle WA; Fulcrum Neuroscience, Palo Alto, CA. Electronic address: cfunk@isbscience.org.
Tom PatersonFulcrum Neuroscience, Palo Alto, CA.
Alex BangsFulcrum Neuroscience, Palo Alto, CA.
David M CannonProvo, Utah, USA.
George SavageFulcrum Neuroscience, Palo Alto, CA.
Eric RinggerBrigham Young University, Provo, UT.
Lee HoodInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle WA; Fulcrum Neuroscience, Palo Alto, CA; Phenome Health, Seattle, WA; The Buck Institute, Novato, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease remains one of the most complex and contested domains in biomedicine, characterized by fragmented findings, competing hypotheses, and limited translational success. We propose that AI can offer not just technical acceleration but a deeper epistemic contribution: reconciliation. Rather than optimizing predictive performance or replicating existing assumptions, the goal is to align disparate data, methods, and mechanistic insights into coherent models that explain how the disease emerges, progresses, and can be treated. This approach centers on digital twins, not as monolithic models, but as flexible, testable architectures grounded in homeostasis, destabilization, and multiscale coherence. Through an iterative, interoperable AI architecture, digital twins integrate evidence, resolve contradictions, and highlight where critical gaps remain. This framework moves beyond incremental progress within the prevailing model to catalyzing a paradigm shift in how Alzheimer's is understood. Reconciliation, in this sense, is not a method but a guiding principle for transforming both the science and its applications.

Indexed as

AIEtiologyLLMsMachine learningPersonalizationReconciliation

Identifiers

PMID41326299
PMCPMC12811772

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.