ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025
Mining the gaps: Deciphering Alzheimer's biology through AI-driven reconciliation.
Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural Products as a Pipeline for Next-Generation Neurodegenerative Drugs: From Single-Target Failure to Multi-Target Opportunity in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and the acceleration of Alzheimer's research - From promise to practice.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease remains one of the most complex and contested domains in biomedicine, characterized by fragmented findings, competing hypotheses, and limited translational success. We propose that AI can offer not just technical acceleration but a deeper epistemic contribution: reconciliation. Rather than optimizing predictive performance or replicating existing assumptions, the goal is to align disparate data, methods, and mechanistic insights into coherent models that explain how the disease emerges, progresses, and can be treated. This approach centers on digital twins, not as monolithic models, but as flexible, testable architectures grounded in homeostasis, destabilization, and multiscale coherence. Through an iterative, interoperable AI architecture, digital twins integrate evidence, resolve contradictions, and highlight where critical gaps remain. This framework moves beyond incremental progress within the prevailing model to catalyzing a paradigm shift in how Alzheimer's is understood. Reconciliation, in this sense, is not a method but a guiding principle for transforming both the science and its applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.