ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparing deep learning CNN method with traditional MRI-based hippocampal segmentation and volumetry for early Alzheimer's disease diagnosis across diverse populations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) driven software has impacted numerous aspects of medicine, leading to automated algorithms that assist in performing feature extraction, making measurements on diagnostic imaging, and aiding in diagnosing disorders. In neuroimaging, AI-based convoluted neural networks (CNN) facilitate the automated segmentation of the hippocampal volume observed on MRI diagnostic imaging, thereby aiding in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Traditional voxel-based morphometry (VBM) used for measuring hippocampal volume can be time-laborious and sensitive to pre-processing errors, thus CNN-based algorithms can minimize the time and reduce human errors. We utilized HippoDeep, an open-source CNN-based algorithm, to compare the MRI-derived hippocampal volumes from a Caucasian population dataset with a Southeast Asian AD and cognitively healthy control (HC) population dataset. ROC analysis demonstrated enhanced diagnostic performance using HippoDeep, yielding AUCs of 0.918 (left hippocampus) and 0.882 (right hippocampus), in contrast to VBM’s 0.788 and 0.741, respectively. We determined the cut-off thresholds for hippocampal volume to further improve the HippoDeep-driven classification method. CNN-based method outperformed traditional semiautomated method in segmentation accuracy (p < 0.001) with non-significant interpopulation differences. Moreover, HippoDeep-derived hippocampal volumes exhibited stronger correlations with MMSE scores, with smaller volumes being associated with lower cognitive performance (r = 0.63 vs. r = 0.42). HippoDeep offers accurate, reproducible, and generalizable hippocampal segmentation, supporting its potential as a clinical tool for early AD diagnosis across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.