Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41326514›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Unintended VOC emissions from cotton and viscose pads complicate olfactory experiments.

Matyas Ripszam, Tobias Bruderer, Serena Reale, Federico Maria Vivaldi, Denise Biagini, Silvia Ghimenti, Tommaso Lomonaco, Fabio Di Francesco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matyas Ripszam *Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. matyas.ripszam@dcci.unipi.it.
Tobias Bruderer *Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. fabio.difrancesco@unipi.it.
Serena RealeDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Federico Maria VivaldiDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Denise BiaginiDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Silvia GhimentiDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Tommaso LomonacoDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Fabio Di FrancescoDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

Horizon 2020 ID 824153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from sweat pads is modulated by both material composition and conditions of use, particularly moisture content and thermal treatment. In this study, we investigated the impact of water addition and heat exposure on VOC emissions from cotton and viscose–polyester unsampled sweat collection pads using dynamic headspace sampling coupled with two-dimensional gas chromatography–high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (DHS-GC×GC-Q-TOF-MS). Water addition led to a pronounced increase in VOC release – including key VOCs with low ppbv odor thresholds like acetic acid, 2,4-nonadienal and 2,3-butanedione – with at least a five-fold increase observed for 110 compounds extracted from cotton pads at ambient temperature. Extraction at elevated temperature (60 °C) resulted in even higher fold changes in VOC release. Heat treatment at 150 °C prior to water dosing further amplified VOC emissions. These observations suggest that cellulose–water interactions play a fundamental role in mediating VOC emission dynamics. Our findings highlight the material- and condition-dependent variability in VOC release from sweat collection pads and underscore the need for rigorous control of hydration and thermal effects in chemical and psychophysical studies involving olfactory stimuli. Given the widespread use of cotton pads in psychological and chemosensory research, these methodological considerations are critical for ensuring reliable chemical analysis and reproducible perceptual outcomes. However, these findings do not invalidate previous work, but rather suggest that it should be interpreted with greater caution. The pad technique may still be useful–provided that large sample sizes and appropriate controls are employed–but it is associated with increased noise.

Identifiers

PMID41326514
PMCPMC12764525

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.