ArticleScientific reports2025
Unintended VOC emissions from cotton and viscose pads complicate olfactory experiments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from sweat pads is modulated by both material composition and conditions of use, particularly moisture content and thermal treatment. In this study, we investigated the impact of water addition and heat exposure on VOC emissions from cotton and viscose–polyester unsampled sweat collection pads using dynamic headspace sampling coupled with two-dimensional gas chromatography–high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (DHS-GC×GC-Q-TOF-MS). Water addition led to a pronounced increase in VOC release – including key VOCs with low ppbv odor thresholds like acetic acid, 2,4-nonadienal and 2,3-butanedione – with at least a five-fold increase observed for 110 compounds extracted from cotton pads at ambient temperature. Extraction at elevated temperature (60 °C) resulted in even higher fold changes in VOC release. Heat treatment at 150 °C prior to water dosing further amplified VOC emissions. These observations suggest that cellulose–water interactions play a fundamental role in mediating VOC emission dynamics. Our findings highlight the material- and condition-dependent variability in VOC release from sweat collection pads and underscore the need for rigorous control of hydration and thermal effects in chemical and psychophysical studies involving olfactory stimuli. Given the widespread use of cotton pads in psychological and chemosensory research, these methodological considerations are critical for ensuring reliable chemical analysis and reproducible perceptual outcomes. However, these findings do not invalidate previous work, but rather suggest that it should be interpreted with greater caution. The pad technique may still be useful–provided that large sample sizes and appropriate controls are employed–but it is associated with increased noise.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.