Evidence mapPaperPMID 41326582Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Integrated multi-omics of mitophagy-related molecular subtype characterization and biomarker identification in sepsis.

Chao Wan, Yajing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chao WanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China.
Yajing WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China. wjjshwyj26@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a life-threatening condition driven by dysregulated host responses to infection, sepsis suffers from high mortality and heterogeneity. Mitophagy is the selective removal of damaged mitochondria, which is implicated in mitigating sepsis-related damage. The systematic identification and validation of key mitophagy-associated genes (MAG) for sepsis diagnosis, stratification, and immune modulation are lacking. Bulk transcriptomic datasets were integrated for differential expression analysis, Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA), and machine learning. We analyzed single-cell RNA-seq data to map MAG expression, performed immune infiltration analyses by ESTIMATE, single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) and conducted consensus clustering based on MAG for molecular subtyping. As a screened MAG, the role of NUP93 was functionally validated in mitophagy using lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW264.7 cells with adenoviral overexpression. Integration of machine learning identified four MAG biomarkers (RPL18, PRPF8, NUP93, CUL1) with high diagnostic power (individual AUCs 0.957-0.975, nomogram AUC = 0.990). Consensus clustering based on these MAG stratified sepsis patients into distinct molecular subtypes with differing MAG expression, immune landscapes, and underlying immune-related pathways. NUP93 overexpression in vitro rescued LPS-induced mitophagy impairment by restoring mitochondrial PINK1 and LC3B levels. This study identifies RPL18, PRPF8, NUP93, and CUL1 as robust diagnostic MAG biomarkers for sepsis, demonstrates their utility in defining molecular subtypes with divergent immune microenvironments, and provides functional evidence that NUP93 promotes mitophagy during sepsis, offering novel tools for precision diagnosis and insights for targeted therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

BiomarkersMitophagySepsisAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingHumansMachine LearningMiceMitochondriaMultiomicsRAW 264.7 CellsTranscriptomeBiomarkersImmunityMitophagyNUP93SepsisSingle-cell sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41326582
PMCPMC12780246

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.