ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
A profile of injuries within an Australian State Emergency Service Agency: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInjuries within the emergency services populations are unfortunately common. Effective injury reduction programs need to be designed based on the profile of common injuries. Therefore, this study aimed to profile the injuries suffered within a state Emergency Services Agency which comprised Ambulance, Fire and Rescue, Rural Fire, volunteer emergency State Emergency Services (SES), and the Communication Centre (CC).
methodsA retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on the entirety of an Australian State Emergency Service Agency injury database over a ten-year period (2012-2022). Records were extracted with details including (a) the total number; (b) the bodily site; (c) the nature; (d) and mechanism of injury. Total injuries were converted into injuries per 1000 full-time equivalent (FTE) years of service and incidence rate (IR) and ratios (IRR) were calculated per service.
resultsIn total, there were 2,703 physical injuries reported by the agency, with Ambulance Services sustaining over half the injuries (57.5%). The most common body site, nature of injury, and mechanism was the lower back (27.9%), soft tissue (59.7%), and body stressing (45.5%), respectively. Based on 1000 FTE years, SES had the highest IR of 2054.2 followed by Rural Fire (IR = 1295.1), Communications (IR = 753.7), Ambulance Services (IR = 566.3), and Fire and Rescue (IR = 183.7). State Emergency Services sustained the highest IRR of 3.64 [3.13-4.22] when compared to Ambulance Services. The age group most likely to be injured were 45-49 years of age (17%), with males suffering the majority (65%) of injuries.
conclusionState Emergency Services present with injury rates above those of other emergency services personnel. These findings lay the groundwork for customised injury prevention strategies to promote better occupational safety across emergency service populations. Tailored injury prevention strategies may decrease subsequent time off due to injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.