Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41327400›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering online2025

Computer models and artificial intelligence increase the fidelity and efficiency of the in vitro models for hearing loss.

Loredana Iftode, Camelia Mihaela Zara Danceanu, Adeline Josephine Cumpata, Marcel Popa, Luminița Labusca, Luminita Radulescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Loredana IftodeGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, 700115, Iasi, Romania.
Camelia Mihaela Zara DanceanuNational Institute of Research and Development in Technical Physics, 700050, Iasi, Romania.
Adeline Josephine CumpataGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, 700115, Iasi, Romania.
Marcel Popa"Cristofor Simionescu" Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Protection, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University, 700050, Iasi, Romania.
Luminița LabuscaNational Institute of Research and Development in Technical Physics, 700050, Iasi, Romania. llabusca@phys-iasi.ro.
Luminita RadulescuGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, 700115, Iasi, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing loss affects millions worldwide and is driven by diverse etiologies, including genetic mutations, ototoxic drug exposure, noise trauma, and aging. To investigate underlying mechanisms and test potential therapies, in vitro models, such as immortalized auditory hair cell lines, cochlear explants, and inner ear organoids, have become indispensable. However, these models face limitations in physiological relevance, scalability, and reproducibility. Recent advances in computer modeling, machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) offer powerful tools to enhance the accuracy, efficiency, and translational potential of these systems. This review explores the current state of integration of artificial intelligence algorithms into in vitro auditory models, highlighting its applications in high-throughput image analysis, predictive modeling of ototoxicity, optimization of culture conditions, and organoid development. Furthermore, AI-enabled tools for analyzing omics data, segmenting cochlear structures, and modeling genetic forms of deafness are presented. Despite promising developments, challenges persist, including data standardization, biological complexity, and model interpretability. Addressing these issues through improved datasets, explainable AI, and clinical integration will be key to harnessing AI's full potential for advancing auditory research and precision medicine.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputer SimulationHearing LossModels, BiologicalAnimalsHumansArtificial intelligenceCochlear explantsCochlear organoidsDeep learningHEI-OC1 cell linesIn vitro models hearing lossMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41327400
PMCPMC12801665

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.