SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of discogenic low back pain: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary expert consensus on clinical diagnosis and therapies for low back pain.Bone research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiscogenic low back pain (DLBP) affects people's quality of life. In recent years, the number of studies on the treatment of DLBP with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has increased, but a systematic summarization is lacking. In this study, all the published research on the treatment of DLBP with RFA was analysed and the evidence-based medical evidence of the efficacy of this physical interventional treatment for DLBP was summarized.
methodsArticles published from the establishment of the databases to February 2025 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrial, Web of Science, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library. After all studies on the treatment of DLBP with RFA were strictly screened, a meta-analysis was conducted.
resultsEleven studies, including eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three prospective single-arm trials (PSATs), demonstrated that RFA significantly alleviated pain on the visual analogue scale (VAS), as shown by standardized mean difference (SMD) (SMD: 1 week, -3.79, P < 0.00001; 1 month, -3.63, P < 0.00001; 3 months, -3.02, P = 0.01; 6 months, -3.48, P = 0.01) and numerical rating scale (NRS) (SMD: 1 month, -2.83, P < 0.00001; 3 months, -3.51, P < 0.00001; 6 months, -4.00, P < 0.00001), and improved functional outcomes, as assessed by physical function (PF) (SMD: 3 months, 0.63, P = 0.006; 6 months, 0.47, P = 0.002) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (SMD: 1 month, -2.18, P = 0.002; 3 months, -2.73, P = 0.008; 6 months, -2.50, P = 0.0002), in patients with DLBP. Comparative analysis revealed both that shorter-duration interventions (equivalent temperatures) resulted in superior VAS, NRS, ODI, and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) scores; and that lower-temperature protocols (equivalent durations) resulted in greater improvements in PF, body pain (BP), and ODI scores. Notably, medium-temperature/short-duration protocols outperformed low-temperature/short-duration regimens in terms of ODI score reduction, as shown by Delta Standardized Mean Difference (ΔSMD) (ΔSMD = 4.53, P > 0.05). However, these symptoms were relieved within a short period of time. No severe adverse events were reported in any of the studies.
conclusion1. RFA is safe and effective for the treatment of DLBP. 2. A radiofrequency protocol of 55 °C for 4 min may represent a potential optimal parameter combination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.