ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025
Urban care farming for older adults: a mixed-method feasibility and acceptability study.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAgeing increases the risk of age-related diseases, but interventions promoting physical fitness, emotional well-being, and social participation can mitigate these risks. Urban care farming (UCF), which uses therapeutic farming in natural settings, shows promise for healthy ageing. This feasibility study assessed the feasibility of the UCF intervention by evaluating the acceptability and adherence of UCF by participants and trainers, implementation fidelity, and outcome measures.
methodsThis feasibility study used a single-arm pre-post design, which recruited 20 older adults (50-85) in Singapore for an 8-week UCF intervention in January 2024. Weekly 3-h sessions held in an estate in Central Singapore focused on farming activities such as planting, teamwork, and nutrition. Participants' recruitment, retention, satisfaction, and experiences of change were tracked alongside trainers' adherence to the intervention protocol. Outcome measures were collected at baseline and follow-up and assessed for reliability and effect sizes. Interviews were thematically analysed to provide deeper insights.
resultsParticipants and trainers responded positively to the intervention. Recruitment reached 80%, with 95% participant retention post-intervention and an overall attendance rate of 88%, reflecting strong acceptance of the programme. Qualitative findings further supported these results, indicating that UCF activities fostered experiences of personal change, a sense of achievement, and community connectedness through social support and friendships. Implementation fidelity was maintained, though challenges such as unpredictable weather affected delivery and necessitated adjustments to certain curriculum components for the main trial. The assessed outcomes demonstrated reliable, moderate effect sizes for perceived stress, anxiety, and social isolation; however, the EQ-5D quality of life measure will be replaced due to its small effect size.
conclusionThe UCF feasibility study was well received by older participants and trainers. Despite the small sample, outcomes demonstrated reliable, meaningful effects on well-being, guiding the design of the main waitlist-controlled trial.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.