ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Risk of autoimmune disease flares after recombinant zoster vaccine: A vaccine safety analysis based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System database.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since its introduction in 2017, limited research has assessed the risk of flares in patients with autoimmune disease receiving the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV). Herein, we evaluated the RZV-related flare risk using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), exploring relevant patient characteristics. RZV vaccination records were extracted from VAERS (2017 Q1-2024 Q3), focusing on individuals diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), multiple sclerosis (MS), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), psoriasis, or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). RZV-related flare cases were identified using preferred terms and symptom descriptions. Disproportionality analyses, including reporting odds ratio (ROR) and three additional algorithms, were performed. Descriptive analyses assessed clinical characteristics and time to flare onset. A total of 920 patients who received RZV were identified, with a flare incidence of 8.5% (n = 78). Disproportionality analysis showed a positive flare risk signal (ROR, 3.00;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.