ArticleGenome biology and evolution2025
Comparative Genomics of the Testacea Group of Drosophila Reveals Introgression and Variation in Chromosome Size and Structure.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Draft hybrid assembly and annotation of the Drosophila palustris and Drosophila subpalustris genomes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comparative genomic analyses among closely related species provide an opportunity to assess their evolutionary history. The relatedness between species can depend on a variety of factors, including reproductive isolation, introgression, and incomplete lineage sorting, and this can impact divergence across the genome. Here, we use a combination of long- and short-read sequencing and HI-C scaffolding to assemble genomes for each of the four species in the testacea species group of Drosophila, including D. testacea, D. orientacea, D. neotestacea, and D. putrida, and its outgroup, D. bizonata. First, among species, we find many structural rearrangements across the genome as well as a large size difference in the dot chromosome that we infer is due to the expansion of repetitive elements. Second, we assess phylogenetic discordance and uncover a difference in the phylogeny inferred from genes on Muller E and the mitogenome relative to the rest of the genome, which may be due to recent hybridization. Lastly, we assess the rate of molecular evolution of genes shared across all species and identify genes evolving at different rates across the phylogeny. Our results present genomic resources for this species group and begin to probe into some of the evolutionary characteristics that contribute to variation in genome structure, while highlighting the need for high-quality genome resources to fully capture and understand the evolutionary history among closely related species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.