ReviewAnnals of medicine2025
Targeting the JAK/STAT pathway in palmoplantar pustulosis: a review.
Review in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- SAPHO syndrome and pustular skin diseases: shared inflammatory circuits, divergent tissue outcomes, and the limits of a spectrum model.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Deucravacitinib in dermatology: current indication and existing off-label data.Drugs in context · 2026Review
- Case Report: Abrocitinib treatment for refractory palmoplantar pustulosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: Secukinumab induced pustular eruption in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPalmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory dermatosis characterized by recurrent sterile pustules localized to the palms and soles, accompanied by significant pain and psychological burden. Refractory PPP remains a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients unresponsive to conventional systemic agents and biologics. Recent clinical observations have explored the use of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), which target key cytokine pathways implicated in PPP pathogenesis. This review summarizes and critically examines the emerging clinical evidence for JAK inhibitors in PPP, mechanistic basis, therapeutic efficacy and safety.
methodsWe collected relevant studies by searching literature published on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and USFDA websites up to July 2025.
resultsRecent clinical case reports and early studies have shown favourable outcomes with JAK inhibitors, such as tofacitinib, upadacitinib, baricitinib, deucravacitinib and abrocitinib, in refractory PPP cases. These oral agents offer broad immunomodulation, rapid onset of action and reversibility, with some patients achieving complete remission after failing conventional therapies. Tofacitinib shows the most rapid and durable responses, generally achieving cutaneous resolution within 2-4 weeks, including in patients with coexisting pustulotic arthro-osteitis (PAO) and SAPHO syndrome. Selective JAK1 inhibitors, such as upadacitinib and abrocitinib, have also shown significant improvement in PPP and associated conditions, with some patients achieving complete remission and good tolerability even in the elderly. While generally well tolerated, potential adverse events such as elevated cholesterol, herpes zoster and cardiovascular risks require careful monitoring.
conclusionsJAK inhibitors emerge as a promising therapeutic strategy for PPP, due to their ability to block multiple inflammatory pathways simultaneously, especially where other cytokine-targeted therapies have failed. However, despite compelling early reports, larger controlled trials are essential to establish definitive efficacy, clarify long-term safety and optimize clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.