ArticleClinical and experimental emergency medicine2026
Patient-reported outcomes in cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome patients treated in the emergency department: a pilot study.
Article in Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Abdominal pain is one of the most common emergency department (ED) complaints, with many patients experiencing recurrent episodes due to cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS), a syndrome characterized by pain and vomiting in the setting of chronic cannabis use. This pilot study aimed to demonstrate the ability to enroll patients with CHS, characterize patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and estimate 30-day revisit rates. Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled adult ED patients with CHS at an academic center and community affiliate. The inclusion required a prior diagnosis of CHS and ED clinician judgment that symptoms at time of enrollment were likely due to CHS. Exclusions included unstable clinical status or other high-risk conditions. Primary outcomes included characterization of symptoms, assessment of multiple domains of PROs, measurement of the use of both computed tomography (CT) scans and opioid analgesia, and frequency of 30-day ED return visits. Results: A total of 18 participants were enrolled (mean age, 34 years; 10 female patients, 55.6%). Automated chart reviews were completed for each outcome of interest at 30 days and at 12 months. Pain severity was high (mean triage pain score, 6.2±4.3) and prior CT imaging was noted in 13 patients (72.2%) in the past 5 years. Opioids were administered in four patients (22.2%), while the 29-Item Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) scores highlighted high risk of anxiety (mean T-score, 56.11±11.45) and how pain interfered with normal activities of living (mean T-score, 62.24±11.11). Return visits occurred in three patients (16.7%) within 30 days. Conclusion: ED patients with CHS show a significant burden on PROs and high 30-day revisit rates. Future studies should consider interventions that address PROs and reduce ED revisits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.