Evidence mapPaperPMID 41328225Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research2025

Advancing pet care through technology: An evaluation of the LINE-based VET PROMPT notification system.

Supaporn Somrup, Anucha Sirimalaisuwan, Warangkhana Chaisowwong, Kannika Na-Lampang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Supaporn SomrupFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Anucha SirimalaisuwanResearch Center for Veterinary Biosciences and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Warangkhana ChaisowwongResearch Center for Veterinary Biosciences and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kannika Na-LampangResearch Center for Veterinary Biosciences and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of the VET PROMPT notification, accessed via the LINE Application Official Account (LAOA). Materials and Methods: In enhancing communication between veterinarians and pet owners. By leveraging pets online, it offers a convenient and cost-effective solution for pet owners to receive timely and pertinent veterinary information, appointment notifications, and disease prevention guidance for their pets. The research involved administering a satisfaction questionnaire to pet owners who subscribed to the LAOA-VET PROMPT group and analyzing responses using statistical measures such as percentage, mean, standard deviation, and one-way ANOVA. Results: Findings revealed high levels of satisfaction among users, particularly with the system's responsiveness and the completeness and accessibility of online pet healthcare. Furthermore, the study discovered significant variations in satisfaction levels based on the type of pet owned, indicating that the specific needs and preferences of different pet owner groups uniquely influence their satisfaction with the VET PROMPT. Conclusion: Overall, the integration of automatic notifications into pet owners' mobile devices significantly enhanced the management and care of pets through streamlined communication.

Indexed as

Notification systempet healthcarepet onlinepet online healthcarepet ownerspets

Identifiers

PMID41328225
PMCPMC12665327

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.