Evidence mapPaperPMID 41328330Full record

ReviewDialogues in health2025

The effect of digital health intervention in promoting healthy behavior: A systematic scoping review on strategies to prevent non-communicable diseases.

Zahroh Shaluhiyah, Shabrina Arifia Qatrannada, Aditya Kusumawati, Mohammad Shahgahan Miah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dialogues in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zahroh ShaluhiyahDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Shabrina Arifia QatrannadaDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Aditya KusumawatiDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Mohammad Shahgahan MiahDepartment of Anthropology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital health interventions are increasingly used to prevent non-communicable diseases (NCDs) by promoting healthy behaviors, yet evidence on which digital features are most effective remains fragmented. This systematic scoping review aimed to (1) identify the most commonly used types of digital interventions and their target populations for NCD prevention, (2) examine the primary objectives associated with each digital feature, and (3) assess their effectiveness in improving knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across seven databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, JSTOR, Medline, CINAHL, and ProQuest). Following PRISMA guidelines, 20 peer-reviewed studies published between 2018 and 2024 met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on digital features, intervention objectives, and outcomes related to knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Results: Messaging platforms were the most common ( Conclusions: Messaging platforms and mobile applications emerged as the most frequently used and effective digital features for NCD prevention. Multi-feature interventions and platform-outcome alignment appear crucial to maximize effectiveness in digital health programs promoting healthy behavior.

Indexed as

Digital healthHealthy lifestyleNoncommunicable diseaseSocial mediaSystematic scoping review

Identifiers

PMID41328330
PMCPMC12664971

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.