ArticleBioMed research international2025
A Hydrophilic Polyurethane Foam Containing
Article in BioMed research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Natural Product to Topical Antimicrobial Candidate: EvaluatingPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Some challenges with current wound dressings include limited availability of advanced options and antimicrobial effectiveness. Polyurethane (PU) foams could be suitable choices as wound dressings once their disadvantages are resolved. PU wound dressings with antimicrobial and therapeutic properties are emerging as valuable options to prevent wound infection and improve the healing process. This study is aimed at developing a hydrophilic antimicrobial PU foam incorporated with Methods: In the formulation of PU foam, polyethylene glycol (PEG) and glycerine ethoxylate were utilized to improve the hydrophilicity. PU foams were subjected to detailed analysis using electron microscopy, FTIR, mechanical properties, liquid absorption, porosity measurement, cytocompatibility, in vitro antibacterial assay, and animal evaluation. Results: FTIR confirmed the linkages of polyols and isocyanate in PU as well as the presence of NSO in the foam structure. The prepared foams had high porosity with homogeneous and interconnected pores. The addition of NSO to hydrophilic PU foam caused increases in tensile strength, elongation at break, and water absorption. The results of the storage experiment showed that NSO-PU foam remained stable under high humidity and temperature conditions. NSO-PU exhibited no significant toxicity on human dermal fibroblasts in the MTT assay. The presence of NSO also gave the foam antibacterial activity against Conclusion: These results indicate that this material can be used as a hydrophilic antibacterial wound dressing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.