ReviewBioMed research international2025
Ultra-Processed Foods and Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Scientometric Study.
Review in BioMed research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evolution and trends in tremor diagnosis and differential diagnosis-a bibliometric study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the academic production of ultra-processed foods and their relationship with neuropsychiatric disorders, assessing trends, collaboration patterns, and emerging thematic areas between 2019 and 2024. Methods: The RAMIBS guidelines for scientometric studies were followed. The search was performed in Scopus using terms related to ultra-processed foods and neuropsychiatric disorders. Studies published between January 2019 and December 2024 were included, excluding letters to the editor and conference proceedings. Data were analyzed with SciVal and R Studio, using Bibliometrix to explore metrics such as Scholarly Output, SNIP 2023, CiteScore 2023, h-index, and international collaboration. Bradford's Law was applied to identify key journals. Results: We identified 53 documents from 50 sources, with an annual growth of 24.57%. The average age of the documents was 2.98 years, with an average of 10.49 citations per publication. Brazil and the United States led in production with six articles each, while the international collaboration reached 18.87%. The most outstanding journals were "Nutrients" (SNIP 1.31, CiteScore 9.2) and "Preventive Medicine" (SNIP 1.37, CiteScore 7.7). Keyword analysis revealed a focus on the relationship between diet, obesity, and mental health. According to Bradford's Law, "Nutrients" led as the most relevant source. Conclusions: The bibliometric data show a sustained growth in research on ultra-processed foods and neuropsychiatric disorders, with Brazil and the United States as the main contributors. The journal Nutrients played a key role as a source of dissemination. Although high thematic diversity was evident, international collaboration was limited, reflecting opportunities to strengthen global networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.