Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328447›Full record

SynthesisJMIR medical informatics2025

Predictive Performance of Radiomics-Based Machine Learning for Colorectal Cancer Recurrence Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yuan Sun, Bo Li, Chuanlan Ju, Liming Hu, Huiyi Sun, Jing An, Tae-Hun Kim, Zhijun Bu, Zeyang Shi, Jianping Liu and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Beyond the biopsy: the new era of non-invasive staging and biomarkers in colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuan SunCentre for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.11 East Beisanhuan Road, Heping Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China, 8613552999260.ORCID 0009-0008-0519-5907
Bo LiPreventive Medicine Association, Yantai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yantai, China.ORCID 0009-0002-4544-9648
Chuanlan JuDepartment of Public Health, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai, China.ORCID 0009-0007-7176-7726
Liming HuDepartment of Spleen, Stomach, Liver and Gallbladder, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0007-2986-9358
Huiyi SunDepartment of Spleen, Stomach, Liver and Gallbladder, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0004-0705-9192
Jing AnDepartment of Spleen and Stomach, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0005-8754-8849
Tae-Hun KimKorean Medicine Clinical Trial Center, Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3931-7139
Zhijun BuCentre for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.11 East Beisanhuan Road, Heping Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China, 8613552999260.ORCID 0009-0006-0051-1662
Zeyang ShiCentre for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.11 East Beisanhuan Road, Heping Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China, 8613552999260.ORCID 0009-0003-5708-7709
Jianping LiuCentre for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.11 East Beisanhuan Road, Heping Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China, 8613552999260.ORCID 0000-0002-0320-061X
Zhaolan LiuCentre for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.11 East Beisanhuan Road, Heping Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China, 8613552999260.ORCID 0000-0003-2992-1578

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Predicting colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence risk remains a challenge in clinical practice. Owing to the widespread use of radiomics in CRC diagnosis and treatment, some researchers recently explored the effectiveness of radiomics-based models in forecasting CRC recurrence risk. Nonetheless, the lack of systematic evidence of the efficacy of such models has hampered their clinical adoption. Objective: This study aimed to explore the value of radiomics in predicting CRC recurrence, providing a scholarly rationale for developing more specific interventions. Methods: Overall, 4 databases (Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched for relevant articles from inception to January 1, 2025. We included studies that developed or validated radiomics-based machine learning models for predicting CRC recurrence using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and provided discriminative performance metrics (c-index). Nonoriginal articles, studies that did not develop a model, and those lacking clear outcome measures were excluded from the study. The quality of the included original studies was assessed using the Radiomics Quality Score. A bivariate mixed-effects model was used to conduct a meta-analysis in which the c-index values with 95% CI were pooled. For the meta-analysis, subgroup analyses were conducted separately on the validation and training sets. Results: This meta-analysis included 17 original studies involving 4600 patients with CRC. The quality of the identified studies was low (mean Radiomics Quality Score 13.23/36, SD 2.56), with limitations in prospective design and biological validation. In the validation set, the c-index values based on clinical features, radiomics features, and radiomics features combined with clinical features were 0.73 (95% CI 0.68-0.79), 0.80 (95% CI 0.75-0.85), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87), respectively. In the internal validation set, the c-index values based on clinical features, radiomics features, and radiomics features+clinical features were 0.70 (95% CI 0.61-0.79), 0.83 (95% CI 0.78-0.88), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.78-0.88), respectively. Finally, in the external validation set, the c-index values based on clinical features, radiomics features, and radiomics features combined with clinical features were 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.83), 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.83), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.78-0.88), respectively. Conclusions: Radiomics-based machine learning models, especially those integrating radiomics and clinical features, showed promising predictive performance for CRC recurrence risk. However, this study has several limitations, such as moderate study quality, limited sample size, and high heterogeneity in modeling approaches. These findings suggest the potential clinical value of integrated models in risk stratification and their potential to enhance personalized treatment, though further high-quality prospective studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMachine LearningNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiomicsRisk AssessmentTomography, X-Ray Computedclinical prediction modelcolorectal cancermeta-analysisPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysesPRISMAradiomics

Identifiers

PMID41328447
PMCPMC12669921

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.