Evidence mapPaperPMID 41328501Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2025

Patient's Perceptions of a Centralized Virtual Ward for Remote Patient Monitoring in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.

Alex Jaranka, Gunnar H Nilsson, Terese Stenfors, Maria Hägglund, Panagiotis Papachristou, Marina Taloyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alex Jaranka *Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, Huddinge, 14183, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3502-6775
Gunnar H Nilsson *Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, Huddinge, 14183, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7811-7602
Terese Stenfors *Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0854-8631
Maria Hägglund *Department of Women's and Children's Health; Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6839-3651
Panagiotis Papachristou *Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, Huddinge, 14183, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4332-6284
Marina Taloyan *Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, Huddinge, 14183, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2773-8975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has the potential to reduce in-clinic visits and promote proactive and preventive care for patients with chronic diseases in primary care. However, a decentralized approach to RPM in a primary health care (PHC) setting has not met stakeholders' expectations regarding scalability. This study introduces a centralized virtual ward (CVW)-led RPM, utilizing a multidisciplinary team approach to monitor patients with chronic diseases by clinicians who do not belong to the patients' PHC center. Objective: This study aimed to gain a better understanding of patients' perceptions of CVW-led RPM for managing chronic diseases in a PHC setting. Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with 22 patients with chronic diseases enrolled at a PHC center in Stockholm, Sweden. The RPM project ran between October 2018 and April 2019 and included a total of 395 patients. Interviews followed a semistructured interview guide and were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Primary care patients with chronic diseases expressed that their contact with the CVW felt impersonal but at the same time secure and accessible. They noted a lack of coordination and communication between the clinicians of the CVW and their PHC providers. Captured data resulted in 1 overarching theme "Sense of security and accessibility, but impersonal and uncoordinated" based on 5 categories: sense of security, care and self-care, accessibility, quality of care, and communication. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that by addressing patients' needs for new organizational routines for patient-caregiver communication, RPM via centralized virtual wards can better realize the potential of this technology.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareTelemedicineAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRemote Patient MonitoringSwedenchronic diseasepatients perceptionprimary carequalitative studyremote patient monitoringremote sensing technologytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41328501
PMCPMC12670054

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.