ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Evaluating sugar-sweetened beverage tax effects: online price and sales data from grocers in Canada.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In-store beverage pricing and marketing before and after a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Newfoundland and Labrador.Public health nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) introduced Canada's first sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax in September 2022. Compared with national averages, NL has higher intakes of SSBs, lower intakes of plain water and milk, with higher rates of overweight and obesity and diabetes. Taxing SSBs is a recommended intervention but real-world effectiveness of SSB taxes requires more investigation. We evaluated changes in weekly beverage prices and sales pre- and post-tax implementation, comparing NL (intervention) to non-tax regions in Canada (control). We used a controlled interrupted time series to evaluate prices from grocery store websites 3 months pre- and post-tax. We observed no differences-in-differences in the intercept [β = -0.024, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.15-0.10, P = .70] or slope (β = 0.00, 95% CI -0.02-0.02, P = .99) of price changes. We used a repeat cross-sectional study to compare total annual sales of beverage categories in the year pre- and post-tax. Per capita sales in litres of taxable SSB decreased more in NL (-11.6%) than non-tax regions (-6.7%). Per capita sales of diet beverages (+4.4%) and unsweetened water (+2.2%) increased in NL. The NL SSB tax had no immediate impact on retail prices of taxable SSBs measured on product selection pages on grocery websites. Beverage purchasing shifted in NL since the SSB tax start date, however, it is difficult to isolate the impact of the SSB tax from broader market trends or other influencing factors. Long-term evaluation of the NL SSB tax is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.