ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Enhancing healthy eating and active play in the Australian early childhood education and care system.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings are crucial for promoting healthy eating (HE) and physical activity (PA) among young children. However, the implementation of health promotion strategies in these settings is often inconsistent and suboptimal. This study applied a systems thinking approach to identify potential leverage points for improving HE and PA promotion in Australian ECEC settings. The study involved qualitative systems mapping through a desktop review and interviews with a purposive sample of stakeholders from the ECEC sector, to explore gaps, opportunities, and strategies, for strengthening HE and PA promotion. Interview data were analysed in NVivo 14 using reflexive thematic analysis within a constructivist paradigm. The desktop review showed that although ECEC quality is regulated in Australia, the standards for HE and PA promotion are vague and inconsistently assessed. Implementation support is provided at the state/territory level, but the availability and intensity of this support vary widely across jurisdictions, resulting in fragmented practices. Interviews with 16 participants, including ECEC providers (n = 4), quality assurance bodies (n = 2), and health promotion support organizations (n = 10) identified three key themes: (i) a mismatch in problem perception, (ii) the 'carrot or stick' approach, and (iii) the need to build sector capacity. From a systems thinking perspective, these findings highlight the need for a nationally coordinated approach to align quality standards, implementation support, and workforce development in the ECEC sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.