ReviewHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2026
Renal Denervation in Asia: 2025 Asia Renal Denervation Consortium (ARDeC) Consensus Statement Endorsed by the Hypertension Cardiovascular Outcome Prevention and Evidence in Asia (HOPE Asia) Network.
Review in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guidelines for the appropriate use of renal denervation systems in Japan: endorsed by the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH), the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS), and their positioning in the JSH 2025 guidelines.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Guideline
- Randomized-controlled trial of sacubitril/valsartan and amlodipine combination in Japanese uncontrolled hypertensive patients (J-SAMIT).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The second Asia Renal Denervation Consortium consensus conference shared information and developed updated recommendations for renal denervation (RDN). Current evidence confirms that RDN significantly reduces blood pressure across all metrics (office, home, and ambulatory) throughout 24 hours. Modern RDN approaches target the distal main renal artery and branches where nerves more closely approximate the vessel wall. Understanding renal artery anatomy is crucial; the main renal artery typically divides into anterior and posterior divisions as first-order branches, which further subdivide into second-order segmental arterial branches. Renal artery electrical stimulation shows promise as a procedural end point, with blood pressure response attenuation after successful RDN suggesting adequate denervation, though the optimal procedural end point remains to be established. The indication for RDN is resistant or uncontrolled hypertension, with high office, home, or 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure readings despite appropriate lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drug therapy. Preprocedure assessment includes comprehensive screening for secondary causes and detailed renal artery imaging. Checklists for preprocedure and postprocedure assessment are provided. Nocturnal hypertension and morning hypertension, which are common in Asia, are more closely associated with cardiovascular risk than daytime hypertension and are more difficult to control with current guideline-driven medication. Based on these Asian characteristics and RDN's long-term durability, RDN should be considered an effective option for facilitating optimal 24-hour blood pressure control. Future research through real-world data collection will help determine ethnic differences in RDN response between Asians and Westerners and identify optimal candidates. In addition, studies are needed to evaluate RDN's ability to prevent organ damage and cardiovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.