Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328650›Full record

ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2026

Therapeutic Values of General Anesthetics: From Developmental Neurotoxicity to Neurotherapeutic Agents.

Tianyun Zhao, Xinying Guo, Ziwen Shi, Haiping Xu, Shiqi Deng, Hangchao Tang, Hui Cai, Xingrong Song

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Therapeutic Potentials of Anesthetics.Current neuropharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Peripheral inflammation in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: associations with genetic and clinical manifestations.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tianyun ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6852-3460
Xinying GuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ziwen ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Haiping XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shiqi DengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hangchao TangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hui CaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xingrong SongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Program, Guangzhou, China 2023A03J0899, 2024A03J1243National Natural Science Foundation, Beijing 82471292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of the central nervous system is characterized by precisely orchestrated, dynamic processes that commence at the embryonic stage and continue throughout postnatal life. Maintaining the balance between excitation/inhibition (E/I) in cortical neuronal circuits is crucial for normal brain function. General anesthetics (GAs) powerfully modulate neuronal activity by enhancing inhibition and/or inhibiting excitability, resulting in temporary loss of consciousness. Therefore, these agents can also induce aberrant neuroplasticity contributing to neurological dysfunction and abnormal behavioural phenotypes, particularly in the developing brain. While this impaired plasticity poses a risk, it also creates an opportunity to treat diseases characterised by abnormal neuroplasticity as core pathologies, such as neuropsychiatric disorders (NPDs). Over recent decades, intense investigations have revealed the neuroprotective and psychotherapeutic potential of GAs in treating neurological injuries and NPDs. Although promising, significant challenges remain, including optimizing dosages, administration duration, and intervals for non-anesthetic uses while minimizing adverse effects. Additionally, the molecular mechanisms underlying the dual roles of GAs - as neurotoxic agents and neurotherapeutic tools - require further elucidation. This review explores developmental neuroplasticity during critical periods, the mechanisms of GAs' action on neural circuits, and the current understanding of their neurotoxic and neuroprotective effects based on alterations in neuroplasticity. Furthermore, we highlight the therapeutic potential of GAs for neurological disorders with impaired neuroplasticity as the core pathological mechanism and propose directions for future research to unlock their full clinical utility.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, GeneralBrainNeuronal PlasticityNeuroprotective AgentsNeurotoxicity SyndromesAnimalsHumansNeurodevelopmentAnesthetics, GeneralNeuroprotective Agentsexcitation/inhibitionGeneral anestheticsneuroplasticityneuroprotectiveneurotherapeuticneurotoxicity

Identifiers

PMID41328650
PMCPMC13269940

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.