Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41329035›Full record

ArticleHealth education research2025

Sexual health literacy and education programs for culturally and linguistically diverse young people living in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom: a scoping review of content evaluations.

Ruth Wagstaff, Kirstie Daken, Amy B Mullens, Claire Moran, Zhihong Gu, Yibeltal Alemu, Judith A Dean

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health education research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruth WagstaffInstitute for Resilient Regions, Centre for Health Research, School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, 11 Salisbury Rd, Ipswich, Qld 4305, Australia.
Kirstie DakenInstitute for Resilient Regions, Centre for Health Research, School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, 11 Salisbury Rd, Ipswich, Qld 4305, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3631-600X
Amy B MullensInstitute for Resilient Regions, Centre for Health Research, School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, 11 Salisbury Rd, Ipswich, Qld 4305, Australia.
Claire MoranTrue Relationships and Reproductive Health (True), 230 Lutwyche Rd, Windsor, Qld 4030, Australia.
Zhihong GuEthnic Communities Council of Queensland (ECCQ), 253 Boundary St, West End, Qld 4101, Australia.
Yibeltal AlemuFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, 11 Wyndham St, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia.
Judith A DeanFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, 11 Wyndham St, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2513-2013

Funding

Sexual Health Ministerial Advisory CommitteeSexual Health Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Young people from key priority communities, represent an important focus for enhancing sexual and reproductive health (SRH). There is an abundance of literature indicating that sexual health programs designed to improve sexual health literacy (SHL) for young people from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds are often developed using established health behaviour models and community involvement models. However, little evidence exists on the processes or standards used to evaluate program effectiveness or update content to remain relevant and appealing. This scoping review of academic literature, and government and not-for-profit organizations reports in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom (countries with similar healthcare systems, immigration patterns and socioeconomic status), was conducted to determine if and how program content was reviewed and evaluated for currency and effectiveness. No academic or grey literature reports were identified that described the assessment of SHL program content or resources targeting young people from CALD backgrounds. Organizations and authors were contacted for further details of program content assessment with little success. This suggests a gap in the literature and lack of program evaluation or processes for updating of program content. This review highlights recommendations regarding advancing future research and enhancing program content evaluation.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityHealth LiteracySex EducationSexual HealthAdolescentAustraliaCanadaFemaleHumansMaleNew ZealandProgram EvaluationUnited KingdomYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41329035
PMCPMC12670635

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.