ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2026
Comparison of efficacy of single-dose and double-dose rituximab in the treatment of refractory nephrotic syndrome in children: a retrospective study.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- APRIL: spring forward also for IgA vasculitis nephritis in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective was to compare the efficacy of single-dose versus double-dose rituximab (RTX) regimens in children with frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS).
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 53 pediatric FRNS/SDNS patients treated at Guangzhou First People's Hospital from January 2020 to November 2024. Patients received either single-dose (n = 36, one RTX infusion at month 0) or double-dose (n = 17, two infusions at 0 and 3 months) RTX (375 mg/m
resultsAt the 6-month and 12-month follow-ups, there were no differences in relapse rates between the single-dose and double-dose groups (31% (11/36) vs. 47% (8/17) at 6 months; 36% (13/36) vs. 53% (9/17) at 12 months). Furthermore, at the 12-month follow-up, no differences were observed between the single-dose and double-dose groups in the annual relapse frequency (0.7 ± 1.1 vs. 1.0 ± 1.2 times/year) or the cumulative prednisone usage (0.21 ± 0.12 vs. 0.22 ± 0.14 mg/(kg·d)). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in relapse-free survival between groups (log-rank test, χ
conclusionSingle-dose and double-dose RTX regimens demonstrate comparable efficacy in maintaining remission in pediatric FRNS/SDNS patients over 12 months. The extended-interval double-dose regimen provides no significant clinical advantage, suggesting that a single-dose strategy may be sufficient while reducing treatment costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41329290What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.