Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41329461›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2026

CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Oncology: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Platforms and Translational Challenges.

Anh-Duy Hoang Nguyen, Minh Trong Quang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Electroporation for High-Efficiency Delivery of CRISPR to Hematopoietic Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. CRISPR-driven strategies to disrupt methicillin-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anh-Duy Hoang NguyenDepartment of Microbiology - Parasitology, School of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6546-4008
Minh Trong QuangDepartment of Microbiology - Parasitology, School of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. qtminh@ump.edu.vn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0703-1922

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology has had a significant impact on cancer research and therapeutic development, providing unprecedented precision in manipulating cancer-associated genes. Although this review focuses on Cas9, we situate it within the broader CRISPR landscape that includes DNA-targeting effectors (Cas9/Cas12), RNA-targeting systems such as Cas13, and type III systems with dual DNA and RNA activity, modalities that expand both experimental and therapeutic possibilities. This comprehensive review examines the current applications of CRISPR/Cas9 in oncology, including its mechanisms and the challenges associated with its clinical translation. Knockout, interference, and activation CRISPR screening platforms have transformed functional genomics by systematically interrogating gene function, identifying therapeutic vulnerabilities, and clarifying resistance mechanisms across diverse cancer phenotypes. This technology has also reshaped cancer modeling, enabling precise recapitulation of disease-relevant mutations from engineered cell lines to patient-derived xenografts that capture tumor heterogeneity and microenvironmental interactions. Notably, the integration of CRISPR/Cas9 with CAR-T therapy has enabled multiplex editing to eliminate alloreactivity, overcome checkpoint-mediated exhaustion, and engineer universal CAR-T cells. Emerging in vivo strategies that directly generate or reprogram CAR-T cells in patients via targeted viral and nonviral delivery underscore accelerating translational momentum. However, significant challenges, including off-target mutagenesis, delivery barriers, p53-mediated selective pressure favoring potentially oncogenic populations, and Cas9 immunogenicity, continue to hinder clinical translation. These limitations necessitate high-fidelity nucleases, optimized guide designs, and improved delivery systems. The future of CRISPR/Cas9 in cancer therapy will depend on technological innovation, comprehensive safety frameworks, and rigorous clinical evaluation as next-generation editing modalities advance toward transformative precision oncology.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingNeoplasmsAnimalsGenetic TherapyHumansTranslational Research, BiomedicalCancer therapyCAR-T cellsCRISPR/Cas9CRISPR screeningGene therapyGenome editing

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.