ReviewMolecular biotechnology2026
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Oncology: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Platforms and Translational Challenges.
Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electroporation for High-Efficiency Delivery of CRISPR to Hematopoietic Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Overcoming Therapy Resistance in Ovarian Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Design and transfection of CRISPR/Cas9 constructs for the myostatin gene in Labeo rohita muscle cells.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- CRISPR-driven strategies to disrupt methicillin-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology has had a significant impact on cancer research and therapeutic development, providing unprecedented precision in manipulating cancer-associated genes. Although this review focuses on Cas9, we situate it within the broader CRISPR landscape that includes DNA-targeting effectors (Cas9/Cas12), RNA-targeting systems such as Cas13, and type III systems with dual DNA and RNA activity, modalities that expand both experimental and therapeutic possibilities. This comprehensive review examines the current applications of CRISPR/Cas9 in oncology, including its mechanisms and the challenges associated with its clinical translation. Knockout, interference, and activation CRISPR screening platforms have transformed functional genomics by systematically interrogating gene function, identifying therapeutic vulnerabilities, and clarifying resistance mechanisms across diverse cancer phenotypes. This technology has also reshaped cancer modeling, enabling precise recapitulation of disease-relevant mutations from engineered cell lines to patient-derived xenografts that capture tumor heterogeneity and microenvironmental interactions. Notably, the integration of CRISPR/Cas9 with CAR-T therapy has enabled multiplex editing to eliminate alloreactivity, overcome checkpoint-mediated exhaustion, and engineer universal CAR-T cells. Emerging in vivo strategies that directly generate or reprogram CAR-T cells in patients via targeted viral and nonviral delivery underscore accelerating translational momentum. However, significant challenges, including off-target mutagenesis, delivery barriers, p53-mediated selective pressure favoring potentially oncogenic populations, and Cas9 immunogenicity, continue to hinder clinical translation. These limitations necessitate high-fidelity nucleases, optimized guide designs, and improved delivery systems. The future of CRISPR/Cas9 in cancer therapy will depend on technological innovation, comprehensive safety frameworks, and rigorous clinical evaluation as next-generation editing modalities advance toward transformative precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41329461What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.