ArticlePloS one2025
Socio-ecological factors influencing dietary behaviours among adolescents and young adults in rural Eastern Uganda: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Systematic adaptation of a visual-aided adolescent nutrition intervention from peri-urban Burkina Faso for rural Uganda using intervention mapping.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdolescents and young adults (AYAs) worldwide display poor dietary behaviors, including high consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and insufficient intake of fruits and vegetables. These issues are more pronounced in Sub-Saharan Africa, such as rural Eastern Uganda, where 45.3% of adolescents eat low-diversity diets high in refined grains and fats. Such diets raise the risk of malnutrition and diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs). However, there is limited contextual evidence on the multi-level factors influencing AYAs' dietary behaviors in rural Uganda. This study examined socio-ecological factors shaping dietary behaviors among AYAs in this setting.
methodsA qualitative study guided by the socio-ecological model (SEM) was conducted in Mayuge District, Eastern Uganda. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were held with AYAs, including male and female, aged 10-14, 15-19, and 20-24 years. To have a nuanced understanding of how AYAs' dietary behaviours are shaped, additional FGDs were conducted with parents or guardians and teachers, and key informant interviews with the district education officer, nutrition focal person, civil society staff, and food vendors. Data were analyzed in ATLAS.ti using both inductive and deductive thematic approaches: data-driven sub-themes were first identified inductively, then deductively mapped onto pre-determined themes of the SEM.
resultsDietary behaviors were shaped by satiety, energy needs, sensory appeal, and nutrition knowledge at the individual level. Peer influence, parental control, and food's perceived link to attractiveness acted interpersonally, while community factors included gendered cultural taboos, norms, and health worker advice. At the societal level, cultural identity, ancestral restrictions, and media exposure strongly influenced choices.
conclusionsThis study contributes novel rural-specific evidence from rural Uganda, where AYAs' diets are uniquely constrained by satiety demands, parental dominance, cultural taboos, and seasonal scarcity; contrasting with urban contexts where convenience, autonomy, and wider food environments prevail. Multi-level interventions integrating nutrition education, family and peer engagement, cultural dialogue, and household food security support are essential for promoting healthier diets in resource-limited rural settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.