ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Cross-sectional assessment of Angiostrongylus cantonensis transmission risk mediated by invasive apple snails in Jiangsu province of China.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Climate-driven invasion ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAngiostrongylus cantonensis, a zoonotic nematode responsible for eosinophilic meningitis, is acquired in China principally through ingestion of raw or under-cooked invasive apple snails-the vector implicated in almost all Chinese outbreaks to date. Despite the widespread distribution of these snails in Jiangsu Province of China, systematic assessments of infection risks and public awareness remain limited. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE
findingsWe carried out a cross-sectional study in six prefectural-level cities in Jiangsu. In total, 732 wild apple snails were collected from different habitats and screened for A. cantonensis larvae by pepsin-HCl digestion and microscopy. 74 local farmers markets were inspected for the sale of live or processed apple snails. Simultaneously, a validated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) questionnaire was conducted with 630 randomly selected residents. Data analysis employed SPSS for descriptive statistics and multivariate linear regression was used to identify predictors of higher scores. All wild-caught snails tested negative for A. cantonensis, and no apple snails were found for sale in any market. Overall, the public demonstrated a high level of knowledge and positive attitudes towards the risks posed by apple snails; however, gaps in practice were evident: 40.3% of respondents reported not separating utensils used for raw foods from those used for cooked foods, and 78.7% reported snail sightings to authorities, while only 22.1% had ever used the Apple Snail Inspector (ASI) mini-program. KAP scores differed significantly among different demographic groups. Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that age, city of residence, and education level were significant predictors of KAP scores. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: While no infected snails were detected in this study, the potential risk of transmission remains because of the widespread presence of competent apple snails. Targeted health education programs that address behavioral gaps among older and less-educated residents could further minimize the threat of A. cantonensis introduction and safeguard both public health and ecological security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.