ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Asynchronous Teledentistry for Caries Detection: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilising Teledentistry for Interdisciplinary Oral Assessment in Older Patients: An International Cross-Sectional Survey.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Assessing diagnostic performance of multimodal LLMs and a custom convolutional neural network in tooth-level caries detection and localization.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsAsynchronous teledentistry has the potential to address oral health disparities by enabling remote caries detection in underserved regions. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of asynchronous, image-based caries detection performed by general dentists in comparison with remote assessments by restorative dentists (reference standard) and clinical examinations by general dentists.
methodsA cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted in Mithi, Pakistan. Intraoral images (n = 3350) were captured using a custom-built mobile application, both with and without cheek retractors. After three months, two general dentists remotely assessed the images using a novel annotation tool (Cario-Label). Their findings were compared against a reference standard established by restorative dentists on remote images. The remote image-based assessments of the general dentists were also compared with the clinical examinations performed by them. Diagnostic performance metrics (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values) and Cohen's kappa were calculated.
resultsRemote assessments by general dentists achieved an overall accuracy of 97% compared with the reference standard. Sensitivity ranged from 98% to 99% and specificity from 69% to 74%, with consistently high PPV (98%-99%). The presence or absence of cheek retractors did not significantly influence diagnostic performance. Agreement between remote assessments and clinical examinations was substantial, with Cohen's kappa values of 0.72 and 0.80.
conclusionAsynchronous teledentistry demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for dental caries detection, comparable with expert remote assessments, and showed substantial agreement with clinical examination. These findings validate the reliability of image-based remote screening in resource-constrained environments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study highlights the feasibility of asynchronous teledentistry as a scalable, cost-effective strategy for early caries detection in underserved populations. By leveraging simple mobile tools for image capture and annotation, task-shifting to general dentists can be achieved without compromising diagnostic quality, ultimately supporting global efforts to improve oral health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.