ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2025
Natural language processing for triage of cerebral large-vessel occlusion.
Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely identification of large-vessel occlusion (LVO) in ischemic stroke is essential for optimizing prehospital triage and enabling rapid mobilization of thrombectomy-capable teams. Traditional LVO screening tools are often lengthy and reliant on neurological examination skills that may be inaccessible to nonspecialists.To assess the ability of large language models (LLMs) to detect LVO using only free-text summaries, with or without National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) data, in a national teleneurology service.We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2,887 suspected stroke cases across 21 spoke hospitals within a national TeleStroke network. Neurologist-authored case summaries were processed using natural language processing techniques, including text embedding and supervised machine learning classification. Contextual LLMs (BERTimbau, BioBERTpt, GPorTuguese-2) were evaluated with five algorithms. The Bootstrap method was employed to mitigate class imbalance, with performance averaging over 100 iterations.Of 1,060 cases included in the final dataset, 143 had confirmed proximal occlusions. Median Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was 9 and mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 5.4 ± 2. AdaBoost paired with BioBERT yielded the highest accuracy (89.82%), precision (98.37%), and AUC (89.86%). Incorporating NIHSS as a numerical feature improved recall (87.60% with multilayer perceptron) and F1-score (89.05% with Dense Neural Network). BioBERT consistently outperformed other models, regardless of NIHSS inclusion.The LLM-based models demonstrated strong performance in identifying LVO using routine clinical narratives. These findings support the integration of NLP and ML in TeleStroke systems and underscore the need for further validation across larger, multilingual datasets to ensure generalizability and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.