Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41330788›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2026

Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease: results from the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 long-term extension.

Jennifer A Zimmer, John R Sims, Cynthia D Evans, Emel Serap Monkul Nery, Hong Wang, Alette M Wessels, Giulia Tronchin, Shoichiro Sato, Lars Lau Raket, Scott W Andersen and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04437511 (Assessment of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04437511 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

Assessment of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2020 to 2028Enrolled1,736ConditionsAlzheimer DiseaseArmsDonanemab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Antibody therapy in Alzheimer's disease].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026
    Review
  3. The value of timely treatment with anti-amyloid therapy for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Cognition in Cardiovascular Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  5. Amyloid-beta-targeting monoclonal antibodies in early Alzheimer's disease: a cochrane review summary and appraisal for the neurological community.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Operationalizing Alzheimer's disease trials in the era of targeted therapies.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Donanemab for early Alzheimer disease.Australian prescriber · 2026
    Review
  11. Further data to address the Alzheimer's coverage with evidence development questions.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Mixing apples and antibodies: when the Cochrane average obscures the evidence in Alzheimer's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  14. What should convince a clinician of disease modification in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials?Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Long-term treatment of early Alzheimer's disease with donanemab.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026
    Article
  18. System changes to empower primary care in Alzheimer's disease detection and care.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jennifer A ZimmerEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
John R SimsEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: sims_john_r@lilly.com.
Cynthia D EvansEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Emel Serap Monkul NeryEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Hong WangEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Alette M WesselsEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Giulia TronchinEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Shoichiro SatoEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Lars Lau RaketEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Scott W AndersenEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Christophe SapinEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Marie-Ange PagetEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ivelina GueorguievaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Paul ArdayfioEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Rashna KhannaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Dawn A BrooksEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Brandy R MatthewsEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Mark A MintunEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDonanemab significantly slowed clinical progression in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD) during the 76-week placebo-controlled period of TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2.

methodsParticipants who completed the placebo-controlled period were eligible for the 78-week, double-blind, long-term extension (LTE). Early-start participants were randomized to donanemab in the placebo-controlled period. Delayed-start participants (randomized to placebo) started donanemab in the LTE. Participants who met amyloid treatment course completion criteria were switched to placebo. An external control cohort comprised participants from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI).

resultsAt 3 years, donanemab slowed disease progression on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR)-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) in early-start participants versus a weighted ADNI control (-1.2 points; 95 % confidence interval [CI], -1.7, -0.7). Seventy-six weeks after initiating donanemab, delayed-start participants also demonstrated slower CDR-SB progression versus a weighted ADNI control (-0.8 points; 95 % CI, -1.3, -0.3). Participants who completed treatment by 52 weeks demonstrated similar slowing of CDR-SB progression at 3 years. Compared with delayed-start participants, early-start participants demonstrated a significantly lower risk of disease progression on the CDR-Global over 3 years (hazard ratio=0.73; p < 0.001). In both groups, >75 % of participants assessed by positron emission tomography 76 weeks after starting donanemab achieved amyloid clearance (<24.1 Centiloids). The addition of LTE data to prior modeling predicted a median reaccumulation rate of 2.4 Centiloids/year. No new safety signals were observed compared to the established donanemab safety profile.

conclusionsOver 3 years, donanemab-treated participants with early symptomatic AD demonstrated increasing clinical benefits and a consistent safety profile, with limited-duration dosing.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04437511.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizeddonanemabClinical benefitDonanemabEarly symptomatic Alzheimer’s diseaseLong-term extension dataTRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2

Identifiers

PMID41330788
PMCPMC12869028

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.