Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41330953›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Information security behavior of healthcare professionals in the Sultanate of Oman based on the PMT model.

A Al Toobi, M Al Suqri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A Al ToobiDepartment of Information Studies, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman. asiaaltoobi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4015-910X
M Al SuqriDepartment of Information Studies, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.ORCID 0000-0002-2673-3814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protecting sensitive information is critical in healthcare. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) must adhere to information security rules to safeguard patient information and maintain the integrity of healthcare systems. This study explores the impact of the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) on the information security behavior of HCPs in the Sultanate of Oman's MOH hospitals. This study uses a quantitative research design to assess information security behaviors of HCPs using PMT factors, including perceived severity, perceived vulnerability, maladaptive rewards, response efficacy, self-efficacy, and response costs. A standardized questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample of HCPs in MOH hospitals in the Sultanate. The study found that perceived severity and response efficacy significantly influence HCPs' motivation to engage in secure practices. Maladaptive rewards did not affect security behavior, likely due to a robust organizational culture and effective training programs. Response costs positively influenced security behaviors, suggesting that effective communication, balancing response costs, and leveraging organizational culture can foster a more substantial commitment to information security. The study highlights the importance of threat and coping appraisal in HCPs' security protocols, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions and ongoing education to foster a security culture.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityHealth PersonnelAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationOmanSurveys and QuestionnairesBehaviorHealthcare professionalsInformation securityProtection motivation theorySecuritySultanate of oman

Identifiers

PMID41330953
PMCPMC12673125

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.