ArticleScientific reports2025
Secure edge-guided adaptive image steganography using HED-based attention maps and CNN.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Content-adaptive LSB steganography with saliency fusion, ACO dispersion, and hybrid encryption with ablation study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Image steganography deals with the hidden transmission of information whereby a secret image is embedded within a cover image in a way that the secret image cannot be easily identified. In this research, we propose a steganographic system that combines edge-aware attention mechanisms using Holistically-Nested Edge Detection (HED) within deep learning frameworks to direct adaptive data embedding operations. The system starts by extracting edge maps using HED then converting them to an attention maps. These high-resolution distance-based attention maps direct adaptive bit embedding operations within cover images by adjusting the number of hidden bits per pixel through attention strength to maintain a balance between capacity and distortion. After that, we embed the secret image within the cover image based on these attention maps. In the embedding process, we use a custom adaptive Least Significant Bits (LSBs) strategy, which follows the predicted attention map that is generated from trained encoder-decoder CNN. On other hand, we optimize the embedding process using a genetic algorithm (GA) to enhance the embedding process through adjusting the threshold values of attention map rules. In this work, we use two datasets (USC-SIPI as secret images and Boss Base as cover images) to test and train our stenographic system. We assessed the performance of our optimized deep learning model based on various performance metrics like Mean Square Error (MSE), Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), Image Fidelity (IF), Payload Capacity (PC), Bit per pixel (BPP), Xu-Net, Ye-Net, and RS steganalysis analysis. The experimental results show that the PSNR value of 60.72-61.20 dB emerges from 0.1 BPP. The SSIM values of 0.9995-0.9996 emerge from this level. The PSNR values reach 58.27 dB and 55.16 dB when the BPP ratio reaches 0.195 and 0.397 respectively while maintaining a [Formula: see text] throughout. The steganalyzers fail to detect the hidden data because XuNet and YeNet achieve AUC values between 0.47 and 0.53 while RS analysis produces incorrect embedding rate predictions between 0.63 and 0.65. The system maintains its robustness against salt-and-pepper noise because it achieves BER values of [Formula: see text] whereas cropping, additive Gaussian noise, and JPEG compression drive extraction toward random [Formula: see text]. Runtime is modest (per image): [Formula: see text]. The proposed method achieves a good trade-off between capacity and imperceptibility and security at low computational cost while keeping the remaining vulnerabilities under cropping and compression attacks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.