ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
A user-friendly machine-learning program to quantify stomatal features from fluorescence images.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In nearly all plants, pores on the leaf surface called stomata are essential for photosynthesis and gas exchange. The shape and distribution of stomata on the leaf varies widely between plants and is directly connected to photosynthetic efficiency. However, our understanding of the factors, both genetic and environmental, that exert subtle but significant effects on stomatal morphology is limited by the time required to manually annotate stomata in large imaging datasets. Here, we present a lightweight and efficient tool, QuickSpotter, for semi-automated stomatal annotation from fluorescence images. First, we establish QuickSpotter's ability to automatically and accurately annotate mature stomata across developmental time. We also introduce an optional, speedy proofreading utility, StomEdit, that allows the researcher to quickly validate and correct machine-generated annotations. We use QuickSpotter and StomEdit to quantify how stomatal morphology evolves at the population level during cotyledon development and demonstrate how the programs can be used to extract subtle differences in stomatal development following pharmacological treatments. Finally, we describe PairCaller, a pair-calling classifier that accompanies QuickSpotter and can be used to identify stomatal clusters, a physiologically relevant and widely studied developmental phenotype. Taken together, our suite of programs facilitates quantitative analyses of stomatal development at scale, enabling high-throughput analyses of leaf phenotypes under varied conditions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.