ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
A graphical user interface for editing keypoints from human pose estimation algorithms.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Markerless Motion Capture for Human Movement Estimation Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Pediatric reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human pose estimation algorithms offer exciting potential for performing markerless kinematic tracking of human movement using only simple videos recorded from common household devices (e.g., smartphones, tablets, webcams). However, these algorithms can be limited by mis-tracking or failure to track certain "keypoints" (i.e., digital markers) associated with specific anatomical locations. These tracking errors can be caused by a wide variety of factors, including hallucinations, occlusions, and noise (among others). There is a need for new tools capable of editing the keypoints resulting from applications of human pose estimation algorithms to ensure accurate kinematic tracking throughout the video of interest. Here, we developed and tested a new pose editor tool that provides a graphical user interface (GUI) enabling users to 1) correct mis-tracked or missing keypoints by manually relocating them to their optimal visual locations directly on the video and 2) run pose estimation directly within the GUI for improved accessibility. We tested the tool on a previous dataset of pose estimation-based keypoints of persons with stroke walking on a treadmill. We observed significant improvements in the mean absolute error between keypoint-based kinematics and ground-truth motion capture data and significant improvements in the correlations between the time series data of the keypoint-based kinematics and the ground-truth motion capture data. Finally, we also observed that the time spent performing manual editing showed a significant positive relationship with the degree of improvement in the kinematic estimates. We have made all software freely available at our GitHub repository: https://github.com/JeffZC/pose-editor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.