Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41333100›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2025

Impact of Expanded Hemodialysis on Subjective Experience Using Dynamic Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Tool.

Jarrin D Penny, Dariuz Gozdzik, Tanya Tamasi, Justin Dorie, Kathy Koyle, Zabrina Bailey Lozon, Rosemary Cesario, Gihad Nesrallah, Christopher W McIntyre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jarrin D PennyThe Lilibeth Caberto Kidney Clinical Research Unit, London Health Sciences Centre, London Health Sciences Centre Research Inc., London, Ontario, Canada.
Dariuz GozdzikThe Lilibeth Caberto Kidney Clinical Research Unit, London Health Sciences Centre, London Health Sciences Centre Research Inc., London, Ontario, Canada.
Tanya TamasiThe Lilibeth Caberto Kidney Clinical Research Unit, London Health Sciences Centre, London Health Sciences Centre Research Inc., London, Ontario, Canada.
Justin DorieThe Lilibeth Caberto Kidney Clinical Research Unit, London Health Sciences Centre, London Health Sciences Centre Research Inc., London, Ontario, Canada.
Kathy KoyleThe Lilibeth Caberto Kidney Clinical Research Unit, London Health Sciences Centre, London Health Sciences Centre Research Inc., London, Ontario, Canada.
Zabrina Bailey LozonThe Lilibeth Caberto Kidney Clinical Research Unit, London Health Sciences Centre, London Health Sciences Centre Research Inc., London, Ontario, Canada.
Rosemary CesarioHumber River Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gihad NesrallahHumber River Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christopher W McIntyreThe Lilibeth Caberto Kidney Clinical Research Unit, London Health Sciences Centre, London Health Sciences Centre Research Inc., London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale & Objectives: Current hemodialysis (HD), using conventional high-flux dialyzers, is handicapped by clearance limitations, contributing to poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptom burden. Recent international consensus guideline-setting efforts have prioritized the identification and management of symptoms and subjective experience, while acknowledging the lack of appropriate tools available to fully appreciate and continuously monitor symptoms. Study Design: Multicenter interventional trial. Setting & Participants: Forty-seven patients undergoing established, conventional, thrice weekly HD in 2 centers in Ontario, Canada. Interventions: Fifteen-month study with the following 5 phases: (1) 1 month observation (high-flux HD), (2) 3 months expanded hemodialysis (HDx); (3) 2 months wash-out (high-flux HD), (4) 6 months HDx, (5) 3 months wash-out (high-flux HD). HRQoL and symptom burden were evaluated using a dynamic patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) tool throughout the study. Outcomes: This study aimed to use a dynamic PROM to interrogate patient experience and confirm HRQoL and symptom benefit of expanded hemodialysis (HDx) using a medium cutoff dialyzer. The durability of the effects of treatment and variability of symptom measures were analyzed, with the aim to further establish causality through withdrawal and reintroduction of therapy. Results: HDx therapy improved HRQoL (19% from baseline) and a variety of symptoms including general wellbeing (23%), energy (33%), sleep quality (33%), pruritus (30%), pain (19%), restless leg syndrome (15%), mood (12%), appetite (9%), breathlessness (9%), and HD recovery (26%). Response was more pronounced in those with poorer HRQoL and higher symptom burden. Improvements were durable over time with less symptom variability. Improvement diminished with return to high-flux HD. Drivers of poor HRQoL were largely general wellbeing, energy, sleep quality, pruritus, and bodily pain. Limitations: Relatively small cohort (because of pandemic restrictions) and unblinded design (partially overcome with wash-out and reintroduction). Conclusions: Use of a dynamic PROM effectively evaluated HRQoL, symptom burden, and response to treatment in HD patients. Use of HDx therapy improved clinically meaningful outcomes with durable effect and was associated with less variability in important symptom domains than conventional high-flux HD.

Indexed as

Expanded dialysis (HDx)health-related quality of life (HRQoL)hemodialysis (HD)patient-reported outcome measure (PROM)symptom burden

Identifiers

PMID41333100
PMCPMC12666834

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.