Oxaliplatin versus irinotecan as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer with prior adjuvant treatment: a retrospective study on efficacy, sequential therapy, and the impact of thrombocytopenia.

Background: The comparative efficacy of oxaliplatin versus irinotecan as first-line therapy in mCRC patients with prior adjuvant treatment remains unclear. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of first-line oxaliplatin-based versus irinotecan-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with prior adjuvant treatment and explore factors influencing survival outcomes. Methods: This retrospective single-center study analyzed 227 mCRC patients (2005-2014) receiving oxaliplatin (n=106) or irinotecan (n=121) as first-line therapy. Survival outcomes, treatment sequences, and adverse events were evaluated via multivariate analysis. Results: Compared with the irinotecan group, the oxaliplatin group had a numerically longer median OS (29.9 vs. 23.0 months; HR = 0.75, Conclusion: Despite the limitations of a retrospective, single-center design, first-line oxaliplatin provides superior OS in mCRC patients with prior adjuvant therapy, independent of the treatment sequence. The OS disparity stems from the differential use of chemotherapy interchange, driven by oxaliplatin-induced thrombocytopenia during adjuvant treatment, which may lead to premature regimen abandonment. Clinicians should prioritize thrombocytopenia prevention and avoid arbitrary oxaliplatin discontinuation. These findings highlight the importance of managing oxaliplatin-associated toxicity to preserve subsequent treatment options, though they require validation in prospective studies.