ArticleBritish journal of biomedical science2025
Mesoporous Silica Microparticle Tablets for Optimised Formulation and Overcoming Compressibility Challenges.
Article in British journal of biomedical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Critical Process Parameters on the Granule Quality During a Binder-Free High-Shear Wet Granulation Process of Mesoporous Silica Microparticles While Achieving Core-Shell Structured Granules.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tablets are the most commonly used dosage form due to their low manufacturing cost and ease of administration. Incorporating mesoporous silica microparticles offers enhanced control over drug release and bioavailability; however, formulation remains challenging due to poor compressibility and disintegration characteristics. This study explores dynamic formulation strategies to enable successful incorporation of SYLOID XDP 3150 (SYLOID) into oral tablet formulations. Tablets were prepared via direct compression using varying ratios of Avicel PH 102 (MCC: microcrystalline cellulose) and lactose monohydrate (25:75, 50:50, and 75:25) with SYLOID incorporated at 0%, 20%, and 40% (w/w). A 500 mg tablet mass was maintained throughout, and SYLOID alone was also compressed to assess baseline behaviour. Key tablet properties including porosity, tensile strength, friability, and disintegration time were evaluated. Direct compression of SYLOID alone failed due to poor compactability and particle fragmentation at 221.72 MPa. Increased Avicel content led to reduced porosity and enhanced tensile strength, while higher SYLOID levels increased porosity but compromised mechanical strength and friability. Disintegration was faster in lactose-rich formulations but delayed with increased SYLOID due to its hydrophobicity. Incorporating a superdisintegrant and binder enabled the final formulations to meet USP requirements for disintegration and friability. Overall, SYLOID was shown to significantly affect tablet architecture and performance, necessitating excipient support to overcome its inherent limitations. These findings support further evaluation of drug-loaded SYLOID tablets to assess their impact on drug release profiles and oral bioavailability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.