ArticleResearch square2025
Multimodal neuroimaging data boosts the prediction of multifaceted cognition.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Relating individual brain patterns to behavioural phenotypes through predictive modelling has been increasingly popular. Several recent studies have focused on the fundamental challenge of improving behavioural prediction based on individual brain patterns, by integrating information from multimodal neuroimaging data. However, the benefit of multimodal integration in brain-based behaviour prediction remains debated due to inconsistent findings. This issue raises the need of a systematic and extensive evaluation. Here, we investigated the necessity and benefit of multimodal integration in 3 large datasets covering different age ranges, using 25 to 33 feature types from different imaging modalities, and 21 behavioural measures from different domains. By setting up multiple predictive models corresponding to increasing levels of multimodal integration, we demonstrated that prediction performance saturates after integrating a few types of features. In general, our analyses revealed that multifaceted cognitive scores tend to require higher levels of multimodal integration, while other predictions may depend on single feature types. In most cases, multimodal integration can remain focused on functional features, especially in young adults. However, predictions in aging can also require structural and diffusion features. Along the same line, while model-free rest and task functional connectivity may provide relevant brain phenotype for behavioural prediction in most applications, in aging, effective connectivity appears relevant too. Thus, our study demonstrates that alternatives to model-free functional connectivity and, more generally, to functional imaging features should be considered for predictive modelling of behaviour, especially in aging populations where understanding interindividual variability in remain as a key challenge.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.