ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Global research hotspots and trends in brucellosis: a bibliometric and visualization analysis based on CiteSpace and VOSviewer.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to elucidate the global research dynamics of brucellosis through bibliometric visualization analysis. The findings have major implications for advancing academic progress in the field of brucellosis research, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and strengthening disease prevention and control. Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection database was utilized as the data source for this study, and literature published between January 1, 1901, and December 31, 2024 was retrieved. CiteSpace and VOSviewer software tools were employed to conduct a visual analysis of the publication volume, countries, institutions, authors, journals, and keywords. Results: A total of 12,810 articles were included in this analysis, with the first publication dating back to 1901.The annual publication volume has increased over the years. The United States had the highest volume of publications and intermediary centrality. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the journal Conclusion: This study indicates that brucellosis research is predominantly concentrated in developed countries such as the United States. Professor Pappas is a key contributor in this research area. The "one health" approach to brucellosis is a current research hotspot. Based on these findings, future studies focused on content, methods, and value may represent a new trend in brucellosis research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.