ReviewJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2025
[Mitigating the Health Effects of Particulate Matter: A Narrative Review of Intervention Studies].
Review in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Particulate matter (PM) is one of the most important air pollutants having harmful health effects. Recently, studies on intervention for mitigating these impacts of PM have been conducted increasingly. This narrative review aims to describe the trends in domestic and international interventions targeting the health effects of PM. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted. Articles published between 1989 and 2024 were retrieved from various academic databases. Results: Seventy interventional studies were included, and were categorized into five types: behavioral (n=12), air purifier (n=22), mask (n=5), pharmaceutical and dietary (n=9), and social policy-related (n=22) interventions. Behavioral, air purifier, and mask-wearing interventions improved physiological and symptomatic indicators related to PM exposure. Pharmacological and dietary interventions substantially reduced the effects of PM, although the study designs imposed limitations. Social-policy related interventions reduced population-level health outcomes such as mortality and hospital admissions. Most of these studies were short-term with small samples. These findings highlight the need for sustainable and comprehensive intervention strategies, especially those linked to local public health services. Conclusions: Interventions for mitigating the health effects of fine PM are effective in reducing adverse health outcomes. The sustainability of such interventions must be ensured, and these strategies must be linked with policy measures for tangibly reducing the health burden caused by air pollution among the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.