Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41334201›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Predicting the potential distribution of

Jingyu Wang, Wang Xing, Pengfei Sun, Dali Liu, Chunxiang Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jingyu WangNational Beet Medium-Term Gene Bank, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, China.
Wang XingNational Beet Medium-Term Gene Bank, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, China.
Pengfei SunHeilongjiang Climate Center, Harbin, China.
Dali LiuNational Beet Medium-Term Gene Bank, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, China.
Chunxiang ChengHeilongjiang Ecological Meteorological Center, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: This study employed an optimized MaxEnt model, integrating species occurrence records with multiple environmental variables, to simulate and analyze potential suitable habitats and their key environmental determinants under various climate scenarios. Results: The results demonstrated that the model configured with the feature combination (FC) of LQPH and a regularization multiplier (RM) of 3 achieved low complexity, minimal overfitting, and high predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.933). The dominant factors influencing the distribution were identified as Bio16 (Precipitation of wettest quarter, 39.5%), Bio9 (Mean temperature of driest quarter, 22.2%), Alt (Altitude, 16.2%), and Bio3 (Isothermality, 7.1%). The 1970-2000 climatically suitable area for Discussion: These findings provide a scientific basis for conserving and sustainably utilizing

Indexed as

climate changeCMIP6Corylus heterophyllaMAXENT modelsuitable area

Identifiers

PMID41334201
PMCPMC12667186

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.